The Theme Of Inherit The Wind Essay Example For Students

The Theme Of Inherit The Wind Essay In the play Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee, the subject is that all individuals reserve the privilege to think. One examply that underpins the subject is the discussion among Howard and Melinda. While dangling a worm before Melinda, Howard comments, Whatre yuh skeered of You was a worm once (4). Melinda answers by shouting that is evil talk and Im going to tell my dad (4). The two youngsters contemplate their convictions and are affected by the individuals around them. The reasoning procedure starts when exceptionally youthful. Kids continually ask the inquiry For what good reason? Howard and Melinda start to consider what is the correct conviction. Another case of the subject happens during the scrutinizing in act two. During the scrutinizing, Drummond urgently attempts to build up that everybody has the privilege to think (64). We will compose a custom paper on The Theme Of Inherit The Wind explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now Drummond says that a man is being investigated and compromised with fine and detainment since he decides to talk what he thinks (64). One more case of the topic happens when Bert and Rachel choose to go off all alone. Rachels choice to split away from the convictions of her intolerant dad and go off with Bert is communicated when she answers to Bert, Im not certain. Be that as it may, Im leaving my dad (110). Cates offers to convey Rachels bag while yelling behind him, See you at the station (115). Theyve concluded that in spite of the fact that they arent sure which conviction is correct or wrong, they need to realize that theyre allowed to talk what they think. Without a doubt, the topic of Inherit the Wind is the privilege to think.Words/Pages : 280/24

Blanches Character in A Streetcar Named Desire - Literature Essay Samples

In Tennessee Williams’ play, A Streetcar Named Desire, the nature of theatricality, â€Å"magic,† and â€Å"realism,† all stem from the tragic character, Blanche DuBois. Blanche is both a theatricalizing and self-theatricalizing woman. She lies to herself as well as to others in order to recreate the world as it should be—in line with her high-minded sensibilities. To that extent, much of her creations arise from a longing for the past, nostalgia for her lost love, her dignity, and her purpose in life. She is haunted by the ghosts of what she has lost, and the genteel society of her Belle Reve, her own beautiful dream. Blanche arrives at Stella’s doorstep with, essentially, a trunk full of costumes from her past. She is intensely self-conscious and a performer in the utmost sense. We meet Blanche at a point in her life where few, if any, of her actions do not seem contrived or performed to some extent.In Scene 3 of Act I, she produces a small performance for her suitor, Mitch, in her efforts to seduce him. She turns on the radio for soundtrack, directs Mitch to â€Å"†¦turn on the light above now!† and exclaims, â€Å"Oh, look! We’ve made enchantment (39)!† as she dances away as the self-cast star of the impromptu performance. Stella applauds from the sidelines as her audience, and Mitch sings and sways to the music. This caricature of a production is repeated in Scene 1 of Act II, where Blanche assigns roles to others as well. With her slightly unwilling newspaper collector, she attempts to set the mood as narrator of sorts. While he answers her request for the time promptly, Blanche chooses to meander into a dreamy digression—â€Å"So late? Don’t you just love these long rainy afternoons in New Orleans when an hour isn’t just an hour—but a little bit of eternity dropped in your hands—and who knows what to do with it (59)?† After she drapes her self in a gossamer scarf from her costume-like trunk, she directs the boy across the stage of her room to receive a kiss before his exit. Mitch’s immediately following entrance with an â€Å"absurd little bunch of flowers† further emphasizes the surreal, parody quality of this exaggerated production. â€Å"Bow to me first!† she orders adamantly, â€Å"And now present them!† Blanche’s deep curtsy and melodramatically affected, â€Å"Ahhh! Merciiii!† give this scene a profoundly self-aware sense of the theatrical. Stanley himself indulges in theatricality at the end, when he dons his wedding night silk pyjamas to celebrate alongside Blanche, who is clad in her tiara and â€Å"fine feathers.† Commenting on their mutual costuming, Stanley acquiesces, â€Å"I guess we are both entitled to put on the dog! You having an oil millionaire, and me having a baby (90)!† However, Stanley’s reason for celebration is grounded in reality (Stella is giving birth in a nearby hospital), and Blanche’s reason is pure fantasy. Streetcar is filled with such instances in which audience and performer are one. The play has been seen by many as postmodernist in this deconstruction of the self. There is no true self—just performances projected out into the world in endless recursivity. In her final confrontation with Mitch, Blanche comes to terms with her deceitfulness. â€Å"I don’t want realism. I want—magic! †¦I try to give that to people. I do misrepresent things to them. I don’t tell the truth, I tell what ought to be truth. And if that’s a sin, then let me be damned for it! Don’t turn the light on (84)!† Much of Blanche’s fabrications result from an acute awareness of sexual double-standards she tries to offset—disadvantages that Williams himself was very attuned to as a homosexual writer. Blanche lies primarily to manipulate he r circumstances to better suit her feminine agenda, explaining to Mitch that she refuses to accept the hand fate has dealt her. Streetcar is, at heart, a work of social realism. Blanche’s need to alter reality through fantasy is partly an indictment of the failure of modernity for women, a critique of the social institutions and postwar attitude of America that so restricted their lives. Blanche lies about her age because she views it as another setback of reality. She puts on an act of propriety for Mitch as well, to better fit the role of a desirable, acceptable woman. As she confesses to Stella, â€Å"I want [Mitch’s] respect. But†¦men lose interest quickly. Especially when the girl is over—thirty†¦of course, he—he doesn’t know—I mean I haven’t informed him—of my real age (57)!† When Stella asks why she is so sensitive about her age, Blanche responds, â€Å"Because of the hard knocks my vanity’ s been given. What I mean is—he thinks I’m sort of—prim and proper, you know! I want to deceive him just enough to make him—want me†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Blanche’s creation of magic is borne of a necessity to cope with and survive reality. Her complete dependence on men blurs her distinction between survival and marriage, and instead she associates Mitch with precious reprieve. When Stella asks Blanche if she even wants Mitch (after Blanche’s rambles of wanting Mitch to want her), Blanche’s response is very telling: â€Å"I want to rest! I want to breathe quietly again! Yes—I want Mitch†¦Just think! If it happens! I can leave here and not be anyone’s problem†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Her desperate obsession with securing Mitch’s desires glosses over the fact that she likely does not desire Mitch for who he is, only what he represents. Their differences are jarring, and his bumbling and boorish nature falls far from her romantic ideals. This is sadly reminiscent of her impossible love for her closeted husband, Allan Gray—that is, love of an image she created. The role she created for her first love proved ultimately unreal and irreconcilable with his true identity. In her present desperation, Mitch represents a sort of emancipation to Blanche, who is incapable of seeing around her dependence on men for financial and social sustenance. This limiting view deprives her of any realistic conception of how to rescue herself, and further deludes the logic of her world and secures her downfall. Her obsession with her own sense of mortality stems from her inability to see life outside of marriage—a life of solitude to her is synonymous to destitution, social death, and essentially, the end of life as she knows it. One has an image of Blanche drowning, struggling to stay afloat, and her growing exhaustion from keeping up pretenses is ominous, marking a looming deadline for the tragic her oine. â€Å"It isn’t enough to be soft—you’ve got to be soft and attractive—and I’m fading now. I don’t know how much longer I can turn the trick (56).† Throughout the play, Blanche also avoids appearing in direct, bright light as part of maintaining her painstakingly constructed image. She especially avoids light in front of Mitch so that he doesn’t see the reality of her fading beauty, refusing to go on dates with him in the daytime or to well-lit locations. She also covers the light in the Kowalski apartment with a Chinese paper lantern when she arrives. Light also symbolizes the reality of Blanche’s past, and her inability to tolerate it foreshadows her increasing inability to tolerate reality as well. Blanche describes being in love with Allan Gray as having the world suddenly revealed by a blinding, vivid light. Since his suicide, the bright light has been missing—â€Å"And then the searchlight whi ch had been turned on the world was turned off again and never for one moment since has there been any light stronger than this kitchen candle (68)†¦Ã¢â‚¬  The bright light reflects Blanche’s greater acceptance of reality back then, as well as her youthful sexual innocence. In the aftermath of Allan’s death, she has experienced only dim light through inconsequential sexual affairs with other men, which represents her sexual maturity and disillusionment.These sexual experiences have made Blanche an increasingly hysterical woman, and her frequent need to bathe herself is another form of employing fantasy, in that they symbolically cleanse Blanche of her illicit past. Just as she can never fully erase or recreate the past, Blanche’s bathing is never finished. This use of water to undo a misdeed is turned upon Stanley as well, whose violent temper is soothed by the shower after he beats Stella, rendering him remorseful and longing for his wife. However, St anley’s use of water doesn’t serve to alter reality to the same extent. This disparity in usage is seen in their use of alcohol as well. Stanley and Blanche both drink excessively in the play, though Stanley’s drinking is social and Blanche’s is antisocial. Blanche drinks on the sly in order to withdraw from reality, and her drunken stupors allow her imagination to take flight, e.g. concocting fantasies of escaping with Shep Huntleigh. While Stanley can rebound from his drunken escapades, Blanche further deludes herself and sinks into greater departures from sanity. Williams dramatizes fantasy’s inability to overcome reality through the antagonistic relationship between Stanley and Blanche, which is symbolic of the overarching struggle between appearances and reality. This struggle drives the plot, and establishes a tension that is ultimately resolved with Blanche’s failure to recreate her own and Stella’s existences. Stanleyâ⠂¬â„¢s disdain of Blanche’s fabrications stem from being a practical man firmly grounded in the physical world, and he does everything he can to unravel her lies. However, one soon realizes Blanche and her fantasies are one and the same—the more Stanley succeeds at unraveling her made-up world, the more he unravels Blanche herself—ultimately to insanity. As Blanche gradually fails at rejuvenating her own life and saving Stella from a life with Stanley, her nerves make her increasingly hysterical over the more minor upsets, and the smallest of setbacks seems insurmountable. It is interesting to note that her final struggle with Stanley is also a physical one in which he rapes her, causing Blanche to retreat entirely into her own world. Whereas she originally colors her perception of reality according to her wishes, at this point in the play, Blanche ignores reality altogether. The play also explores the boundary between the exterior and interior through use of the set. The flexible set allows the surrounding street to be seen at the same time as the interior of the Kowalski apartment, expressing the notion that the home is not a domestic sanctuary. Blanche cannot escape from her past in Stella and Stanley’s home because it is not a self-defined world, impermeable to greater reality. The characters often bring into the apartment issues and problems encountered in the larger environment, such as Blanche bringing her prejudices against the working class. The back wall of the apartment also becomes transparent at various points in the play to show what is happening on the street. A notable instance of this is just before Stanley rapes Blanche, and the struggles on the street are shown to foreshadow the violation about to occur within the home. Although reality ultimately triumphs over fantasy in Streetcar, Williams suggests through Blanche’s final, deluded happiness, that fantasy is an important and useful tool, a vita l force which colors every individual experience, despite the inevitable triumph of objective reality. At the end of the play, Blanche’s retreat into her own private fantasies enables her to partially shield herself from reality’s harsh blows. Her sensitive nature is seen in her reproach to Mitch, â€Å"I thanked God for you, because you seemed to be gentle—a cleft in the rock of the world that I could hide in (85)!† To Blanche, the world is hard, cold, and unfriendly like the rock, and she is unable to face its indifference directly. Blanche’s insanity emerges as she retreats fully into herself, leaving the objective world behind in order to avoid accepting reality. In order to escape fully, Blanche must come to perceive the exterior world as that which she imagines in her mind. When Mitch accuses Blanche of lying to him toward the end, she answers, â€Å"Never inside. I didn’t lie in my heart (85).† Thus, objective reality is not an antidote to Blanche’s fantasy world; rather, Blanche adapts the exterior world to fit her delusions.In Scene Seven, Blanche sings the popular ballad, â€Å"It’s Only a Paper Moon,† while she bathes. The lyrics of the song reflect Blanche’s fantastical understanding of herself and her approach to life: â€Å"Its a Barnum and Bailey worldJust as phony as it can beBut it wouldnt be make-believeIf you believed in me.† Similarly, Blanche views her fibs as harmless and as a means of enjoying a better way of life, requiring only her object of devotion to believe in this imagined reality as well. Williams ironically juxtaposes her bathroom singing with Stanley’s revelation of her sexually corrupt past to Stella in the room outside. Here, even within the domestic set, these fantasies cannot be compartmentalized effectively. Though the bathroom houses a temporary reprieve from reality, the boundary between fantasy and reality is essential ly permeable on all levels—in both the physical and psychological realms, between the apartment and the street, and within the two-room apartment as well. While fantasy and theatricality begin with Blanche, they do not end with her departure in the play. As Blanche leaves with the doctor, Stella is still living in denial. â€Å"I couldn’t believe her story and go on living with Stanley!† she tells Eunice beforehand. Stella chooses to live with herself and Stanley by telling herself a much greater lie than any ever concocted by her sister. The necessity of fantasy in handling reality is reinforced a final time, as Eunice assures Stella, â€Å"Don’t you ever believe it. You’ve got to keep on goin’, honey. No matter what happens, we’ve all got to keep on going.†

The Use of Trickery, A Theme in the Novel The Life of...

Some people deceive others into doing their bidding for them, while others trick for the jokes that come out of it; however, some may claim the need to trick is a requirement to survive. In Frederick Douglass’s Narrative in the Life of Frederick Douglass, Douglass utilizes the ability to play the game of trickery to convey his journey to freedom. Through the use of anecdotes, appeal to pathos, and figurative language, Douglass expresses the necessity of slaves to play the game of trickery to survive in the world of tricksters. Douglass employs the use of anecdotes to clarify why he would deceive others. After Mrs. Auld’s transformation, Douglass resorts to â€Å"various stratagems† (22) to learn to read and write. In some sense, Douglass†¦show more content†¦Humans need nourishment to survive; if they do not get their nourishment, they will suffer fatigue, and although the slaves do not get enough food, Douglass and the three other slaves in the kitchen receive only â€Å"half a bushel of corn-meal per week† (31), which is not much, justifying Douglass’s ploy with his master’s horse. Lastly, Douglass employs the anecdote about Sandy’s root and the fight with Convey to explain the slave’s survival in the world of trickery. Douglass receives a root from Sandy Jenkins which requires carrying â€Å"always on†¦ [the] right side† (42) to prevent from being whipped by a â€Å"white man.† Though Douglass is skeptical and believes Sandy is a charlatan at first, Douglass accepted the gift. To test if the root truly performs its duty, Douglass and Mr. Convey commenced a fight. Mr. Convey’s â€Å"courage quailed† when Douglass fights back. No one disturbs the two hour fight between the workers at Mr. Convey’s farm, including Bill, a hired worker. Since no harm came to him during the fight, Douglass believes in the powers of the root; this action of trickery leads to Douglass’s survival in a trickster’s world. By exploiting Mr. Convey’s game at which he plays, claiming none could deceive him, Douglass is able to counter Mr. Convey, beating him at the game of trickery. Douglass recounts the anecdotes of his life to communicate the importance of hoaxing

Essay on Brave New World-Allusions - 1337 Words

Allusions to the Brave New World 1. Ford Henry Ford (1863-1947) revolutionized the automobile industry with the assembly line method of production, which proved very successful for 15 million Model Ts were sold. Humans were similarly produced in the Brave New World where the embryos passed along a conveyor belt while a worker or machine would have a specific task dealing with the specimen. Again, this assembly line method proved very successful. 2. Lenina Vladmir Lenin (1870-1924) founded the communist party in Russia and the worlds first communist dictatorship. He believed in Karl Marxs theories that government is affected by underlying economic forces. Lenins dictatorship resembles that of Mustapha Mond for both of them†¦show more content†¦11. Watson John Broadus Watson (1878-1958) was an American psychologist who became the leader of a revolutionary movement called behaviorism. He studied innate behaviors and experimented on it. The people, in the BNW, had their behaviors controlled through experiments from when they were small. Without his theories, Huxley couldnt have completed his novel. 12. Marx Karl Marx (1818-1883) was a German philosopher, social scientist, and a revolutionary professional. Above all, however, he was the chief founder of Democratic Socialism and Revolutionary Communism. He was also famous for writing the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital. He wrote with Engles. Marxs communism government structure was practiced in the ‘civilized world. Caste systems were present, everyone worked for the nations sake, and an elite controlled the whole civilization. 13. Engles Fredrich Engles (1820-1895) was a German social scientist, journalist, and professional revolutionary. He was chiefly known for his close collaboration with Marx. He helped Marx with ideas on economics and with his writings. His communist beliefs took effect in the BNW in the concept that everyone is enslaved to the civilization and that there is complete equality in each caste. 14. Noble Savage The Noble Savage was the concept of a superior primitive man uncorrupted by civilization who lives under just and reasonable laws. In the book, John Savage was an unfetteredShow MoreRelatedAllusion, And Logos In Aldous Huxleys Brave New World762 Words   |  4 Pagesthe novel, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, Huxley includes allusion, ethos, and pathos to mock the wrongdoings of the people which causes physical and mental destruction in the society as a whole. The things that happened in the 1930’s plays a big contribution to the things that go on in the novel. The real world can never be looked at as a perfect place because that isnt possible. In this novel, Huxley informs us on how real life situations look in his eyes in a nonfictional world filled withRead MoreAllusions in Brave New World1665 Words   |  7 PagesNot only did he change how automobiles were manufactured, he changed the way people thought about technology. He made new technologies readily accessible and set the standard for the 20th century. In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, Huxley makes Ford the center-point for why the new society was created, the old one was un-happy and inefficient. Replacing God with Ford, Brave New World, showcases how Ford’s ideas could have been implemented. 2. Vladimir Lenin was the first person to make a countryRead More Allusions to the Brave New World Essays1308 Words   |  6 Pages Allusions to the Brave New World 1. Ford Henry Ford (1863-1947) revolutionized the automobile industry with the assembly line method of production, which proved very successful for 15 million Model Ts were sold. Humans were similarly produced in the Brave New World where the embryos passed along a conveyor belt while a worker or machine would have a specific task dealing with the specimen. Again, this assembly line method proved very successful. 2. Lenina Vladmir Lenin (1870-1924) foundedRead More Free Brave New World Essays: Huxley and Shakespeare540 Words   |  3 Pages In Aldous Huxleys â€Å"Brave New World, allusions to William Shakespeare and his works emphasize the contrast between the Brave New World and the world in Shakespeares time and even the current time period. Enhancing the works meaning, the allusions and characters reactions to the allusions reveal the positive and negative aspects of our society today. The main characters in Brave New World, Lenina Crowne, Henry Foster, and Bernard Marx, live in a futuristic world where babies are massRead MoreBrave New World Exploration And Extension1347 Words   |  6 PagesDanielle Newman Camille Hensley Coach Hansen British Literature August 7, 2015 Brave New World Exploration and Extension Aldous Huxley was born in Surrey, England on July 26, 1894. He came from a family already intertwined with a love of writing and philosophy. His grandfather was already credited with introducing Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to the public. Huxley’s mother was the niece of Matthew Arnold, a poet who focused on commonly debated moral themes in his works. Needless to sayRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Brave New World925 Words   |  4 PagesThroughout the novel, Brave New World, the author, Aldous Huxley strategically incorporates various Shakespearean allusions into his story. The most distinguished allusion throughout the entirety of the novel is to a quote from The Tempest, a play about a sorcerer and his daughter that live together on a remote island. The quote from The Tempest, in which Brave New World derives its name, â€Å"O, wonder!/How many goodly creatures are there here!/How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world,/That has such peopleRead More`` Deat h Of Discourse `` By Ronald K. L. Collins And David M. Skover759 Words   |  4 Pagesgain clarity on how the media is warping american society; to show americans just exactly how the first amendment is misused. Collins and Skover starts the piece by defining discourse and relating it back to the works of Aristotle, a greater allusion to the systems of communications in the past, as well as they describe America’s current interpretation of discourse through it’s personal interpretation of free speech. The authors state, â€Å"To communicate with uninhibited liberty, to talk in theRead More72F. Mr. Fredrick. Advanced English 9 - 7. February 8,999 Words   |  4 Pageslife of Aldous Huxley, he portrayed many of his problems in Brave New World. Huxley wrote a work that not only made the reader look upon Huxley’s time, but also make them look at their own and make a connection to see if the reader had similar problems still occurring. Literary devices such as characterization and allusions were used by Huxley to give the reader an idea of what was occurring in Huxley’s lifetime. Throughout Brave New World Huxley expressed three main problems: religion, the roleR ead MoreAldous Huxley s Brave New World1334 Words   |  6 Pageso read Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is to understand the fear for the future during the 1930’s. Widely considered ahead of its time, Brave New World is one of the most influential novels regarding the destructive outcome of genetic and public manipulation through regime control. The story contrasts two worlds: the traditional world where the â€Å"savages† reside and the new World State: a negative utopia where unrestrained sexual freedom, reproductive technology, and mind numbing drugs run rampantRead MoreAnalysis Of Aldous Huxley s Brave New World 1250 Words   |  5 PagesAldous Huxley published a Brave New World in 1932 in which he depicts a society in which babies are born in bottles, the concept of an individual cell does not matter as people do not believe in intimacy, science is used as a form of control, subjugation and conditioning, and drugs as well as sex are forms of escaping the horrors of reality. Or as Laurence Brander (1970) put it, â€Å"Affection and loyalty are unnecessary, beauty is a synthetic product, truth is arranged in a test tube, hope is supplied

A Pair Of Star

A Pair Of Star-crossed Lovers, Romeo And Juliet. From The Opening Scen Essay A pair of star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet. From the opening scenes of the play these two children of feuding families were destined to fall in love together and eventually die together. How does the reader see this? How do we know it was fate which triggered these events? Coincidence caused the death of these two lovers. For this reason Romeo and Juliet is one of Shakespeares great tragedies. For coincidence to have caused the death of Romeo and Juliet it must have been evident in the events leading up to their deaths. These events include their meeting and falling in love, their separation, their reunion and finally their suicides. Solving the ancient feud between their families was the only real result of these untimely deaths. How did Romeo and Juliet meet? Was it by fate or could it have been avoided? Romeo and Juliet could not have avoided coming in contact with each other, they were brought together by uncontrollable circumstances. In Romeo and Juliets time Verona (a city in Italy approximately 100 km west of Venice) was a fair sized city, and bumping into an acquaintance was unlikely. During the course of Act I, Scene II, the contrary had happened, and happened by chance. As Romeo and Benvolio were nearing a public area they were stopped by a Capulet servant. After Romeo had read the guest list to the Capulet party and the servant was on his way, Benvolio suggested that to relieve himself of his sadness for Rosaline, Romeo should go to the party and compare Rosaline to the other female guests. Romeo agreed Another example of coincidence is evident here. If Rosaline had not been attending, Benvolio would not have thought anything of the party. During the Capulets ball Romeo and Juliet had seen each other, once this happened, there was no force that could have stopped them from falling in love. The encounter with the servant in the city set off an unlikely chain of events. Given the information following, none of these events could have been altered or avoided . And for that offense immediately we do exile him hence, (Romeo and Juliet, III, II, 191-192). Romeos banishment and the fate involved with it is a prime factor in the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Why banishment? In Act I, Scene I the Princes words were quite the contrary. Was it intentional that a man of such high standard would go back on his word? Perhaps. Romeos exile poisons all possibility of happiness for himself and Juliet. His exile causes Juliet great sorrow, greater then if he had been executed, as stated by Juliet in Act III, Scene II, lines 130-131. Juliets sorrow drives her to obtain a knockout potion from Friar Laurence which, in effect causes Romeo to make some important decisions regarding his well being. Romeos banishment (brought about by the death of Tybalt) initiated the Friars scheme which eventually leads the two lovers to their deaths. In reuniting the two lovers, timing played the largest role in deciding if they would live or die. Friar Laurence had two chances to deliver the message to Romeo regarding Juliets present state. The first and most practical method of sending this message was through Romeos man, Balthasar. The second method was to send the message with Friar John. Timing was an important factor in both of these events. Friar Laurence had missed his opportunity to send the message with Balthasar and reverted to sending it with Friar John. As fate would have it, Friar John was locked up in a condemned house because of the plague. As a result Romeo received incorrect information. The only information he received from the unsuspecting Balthasar was that Juliet was dead. There are two important points to note in this area of the play. One being the reference to star-crossing made by Romeo when he heard of Juliets death. Is it even so? then I defy you, stars. (Romeo and Juliet, V, I, 24). The second being that when Romeo received the poison he states Come cordial, and not poison, go with thee. (Romeo and Juliet, V, I, 85). This is coincidental to what Juliet had said earlier, in Act IV, Scene III, when she drinks to Romeo. Cordial means hearty, or sincere. When someone drinks to someone else it is usually in good health. The reuniting of the two lovers in such circumstances (Romeos unawareness) could only have happened as it did by timing. One could ask what if the friar had left early?, or what if the friar had caught Balthasar and given him the message? Because of bad timing neither happened. Coincidence is a controlling element regarding the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, more so than in other areas of the play. The following examples also deal with close-calls, which involve timing as well as coincidence After Romeo had slew Paris and entered the tomb and found Juliets seemingly dead body, he uttered some interesting words. Death that hath sucked the honey of thy breath, hath had no power yet upon thy beauty. Thou art not conquered; beautys ensign yet is crimson in thy lips and cheeks. (Romeo a nd Juliet, V, III, 92-95.). Here Romeo is saying how alive Juliet looks. All he had to do was touch her and she may have been awakened and the play would have ended without a tragic closing. As Romeo drank the apothecaries mixture he drank to Juliet, as she had done before in Act IV, Scene III. This minor coincidence does not have much bearing on the course of the play, but changes the way we think of toasting to someone. Friar Laurence entered the tomb just less than half an hour after Romeo had killed himself. If the Friar had entered the tomb earlier he could have explained the situation to Romeo and no harm would have come to anyone. The Friar has proved himself to be a brave man. He married Romeo and Juliet without the consent of Juliets father. Then why did the friar behave out of character and leave the tomb when he heard the call of the watch. This gave Juliet the opportunity to get hold of Romeos well placed dagger (coincidence?) and kill herself. If the Friar had not fled he would have convinced Juliet not to kill herself as he did with Romeo in Act III, Scene III. To prove Romeo and Juliet to be a tragedy we must first prove that the death of the two lovers was caused by circumstances outside of their control or more simply, by destiny. The events which lead up to Romeo and Juliets death are all inter-related. If any of the events were absent from the list, the following events could not of happened. The list, as mentioned before is as follows; meeting, separation, reunion, and their suicides. Romeo and Juliets meeting has been proved to be by coincidence. If Romeo and Benvolio had not bumped into the Capulet servant the events would not have unfolded in the way they did. Romeo and Juliet had been separated because Prince Escalus had ordered it, what makes this unusual is that in Act I, Scene I, the Princes warning indicated that further violent confrontations would result in death. Romeo did not receive the message from the Friar in Act V, Scene I, because of coincidence. If he had received the message, the Friars scheme would have gone as planned. Coincidence is exceedingly evident when Romeo enters the tomb to die with Juliet as proven earlier. As the coincidences in the novel build up, the readers idea of reality changes, and enables Shakespeare create one of his greatest tragedies, Romeo and Juliet. .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .postImageUrl , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:hover , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:visited , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:active { border:0!important; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:active , .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10 .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4d79f9126680f6b1eaccfb72aefdfd10:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Who's For The Game?   Essay We will write a custom essay on A Pair Of Star-crossed Lovers, Romeo And Juliet. From The Opening Scen specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now

THE MASSACRE AT PARIS Essay Example For Students

THE MASSACRE AT PARIS Essay A monologue from the play by Christopher Marlowe NOTE: This monologue is reprinted from Masterpieces of the English Drama. Ed. William Lyon Phelps. New York: American Book Company, 1912. DUKE OF GUISE: Now, Guise, begin those deep-engenderd thoughtsTo burst abroad those never-dying flamesWhich cannot be extinguished but by blood.Oft have I levelld, and at last have learndThat peril is the chiefest way to happiness,And resolution honours fairest aim.What glory is there in a common good,That hangs for every peasant to achieve?That like I best, that flies beyond my reach.Set me to scale the high Pyramides,And thereon set the diadem of France;Ill either rend it with my nails to naught,Or mount the top with my aspiring wings,Although my downfall be the deepest hell.For this I wake, when others think I sleep;For this I wait, that scorn attendance else;For this, my quenchless thirst, whereon I build,Hath often pleaded kindred to the king;For this, this head, this heart, this hand, and sword,Contrives, imagines, and fully executes,Matters of import aimed at by many,Yet understood by none;For this, hath heaven engenderd me of earth;For this, this earth sustains my bodys weigh t,And with this weight Ill counterpoise a crown,Or with seditions weary all the world;For this, from Spain the stately CatholicsSend Indian gold to coin me French ecues;For this, have I a largess from the Pope,A pension, and a dispensation too;And by that privilege to work upon,My policy hath framd religion.Religion! O Diabole!Fie, I am ashamd, however that I seem,To think a word of such a simple sound,Of so great matter should be made the ground!The gentle king, whose pleasure uncontrolldWeakeneth his body, and will waste his realm,If I repair not what he ruinates,Him, as a child, I daily win with words,So that for proof he barely bears the name;I execute, and he sustains the blame.The Mother-Queen works wonders for my sake,And in my love entombs the hope of France,Rifling the bowels of her treasury,To supply my wants and necessity.Paris hath full five hundred colleges,As monasteries, priories, abbeys, and halls,Wherein are thirty thousand able men,Besides a thousand sturdy student Catholics;And more,of my knowledge, in one cloister keepFive hundred fat Franciscan friars and priests:All this, and more, if more may be comprisd,To bring the will of our desires to end.Then, Guise,Since thou hast all the cards within thy hands,To shuffle or cut, take this as surest thing,That, right or wrong, thou deal thyself a king. We will write a custom essay on THE MASSACRE AT PARIS specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now

The History of Stem Cell Research

The History of Stem Cell Research Free Online Research Papers Stem cells, many have heard the name, but really don’t understand the theory or research behind it. Stem cell research had a slow uprising in the mid 1800’s and had exploded here in the 21st century. It started out with the discovery that some cells can regenerate or create other cells. Now stem cell research is stuck in a controversy over the usage of these cells for research. The first real proof of stem cell capabilities was discovered in the early 1900’s with the discovery of the regeneration of blood cells. They’re similar to cells that duplicate through mitosis and a new creation of another cell all together. The first stem cell research came along with the findings of animal and human stem cells. A stem cell is a cell that has the ability to continuously divide and differentiate into various kinds of cells and tissues. It’s somewhat similar to a blank micro chip; it can be made to be specialized at anything, like our stem cells. When certain conditions occur in the laboratory stem cells can be manipulated to be specialized to create various kinds of cells and tissues. The main reason for this research is the treatment of life threatening and debilitating diseases such as cancer Parkinson’s disease and even diabetes. If scientists are able to figure out the genetic programming of these cells then one day they can program them to work for our benefit and make human life better, more sufficient and give us the ability to repair damaged tissues and organs and better understand disease processes. In work with the human genome experiments and advanced gene-line engineering stem c ells can be the next cure for everything and the possibilities are endless. Cloning of humans and animals and the permanent resistance of harmful and currently incurable diseases is the goal of this research in whole. There are different kinds of stem cells that contribute to research, but all are not constitutionally considerate and lead to the debates that we have now that cripple this research and slow down our race; the human race. The discovery of the embryonic stem cells is important to research which can only be collected from the inner-mass of the blastocyst (unborn fetus) seven to 10 days after initial fertilization in a human female uterus. There is the fetal stem cell, which the cells are taken from the germ-line tissues that make up the gonads of aborted fetuses. Umbilical cord stems cells are similar to those found in adult bone marrow. Placenta stem cells can accumulate ten times more stem cells than umbilical cord blood. Then there are adult stem cells, many can be isolated and used for the goals that want to be reached, but let’s narrow it down. There are three broad categories of stem cells classified by their abilities to differentiate or vary. Totipotent stem cells can ne found in early embryos and each of these cells can create one full organism such as an identical twin, very useful in the cloning of any organism. Pluripotent are like the embryonic stem cells and can vary into over 200 different cell types found in every human. Multipotent stem cells are those of adult cord blood and fetal tissue stem cells. Their abilities are narrower than those of pluripotent cells, but already have successful records for cell based and minor gene based therapies. The use of these cells are very complicated, but can be attained. The first real use of them was the administration of adult stem cells in connection with bone- marrow transplants. At this time bone marrow was being administered through the mouth to patients who suffered from anemia and leukemia. This therapy had no success, but led to the quick discovery of lab experiments that ultimately showed that mice with defective marrow could be restored to complete health by infusing marrow from other mice into the mouse with defective marrow. These lead physicians across the globe wondering if marrow could be transplanted from one human to another, which today is called the allogeneic transplant. Early experimentation of this procedure was happening during the radiation accident in the late 1950’s which kept it low on radar. Usage of this procedure didn’t inflate until a French medical researcher (Jean Dausset) made a discovery about the human immune system that discovered antigens that were proteins connected to most human cells that are called HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens). Basically they determine what belongs to one body and what does not, such as, blood germs ect†¦ If the body doesn’t recognize the series of proteins or antigens on the cell walls of the cells then the body creates anti bodies and other things to dispose of it. A bone marrow between complete identical twins guarantees complete HLA compatibility between the donor and recipient. Not until the late 1600’s were scientists able to perform these kind of transplants on non identical siblings. The first successful transplant of unrelated bone marrow between two non siblings happe ned in ’73 requiring 7 transplants to be complete. With this, in ’84 the National Donor Society was created and is the first national list of donors, thanks to Congress and the Nation Organ Transplant Act. It allowed clearance to evaluate unrelated marrow, which lead to the NDWP (National Marrow Donor Program) that took over lists for hundreds of thousands of people in ’90. So far the NDWP has completed over 16,000 transplants for treatments of immunodeficiency and leukemia combined. Adult stem cells have also been a perfect candidate for research due to their ability to form many kinds of cells and tissues that can repair brain, liver and even heart cells, consumed by disease, but there were some very unhappy people debating these procedures. Pro-Life activists believe that it is unethical to take a life to save a life and started this debate. This is purely scientific and is rendering stem cell research hopeless because, it is totally impossible to harvest the potential of these cells using them to save the living and protect the â€Å"sanctity of life† at the same time. With plain fact that these cells possibly hold the secrets to cures preventions and treatments of the most undetermined diseases it would seem that this would be a no brainer. Politically though the battle is something of a tougher substance. This debate is clearly the battle over abortion and religiously an embryo is considered a life, but many families and patients depend on the use of these cells. Also, these cells would normally be discarded and put to no use. This debate has left political figureheads left with the fact that any decision made can be considered to be left at a reevaluation of positions. In ’73 a moratorium was placed on the government for federal funding of stem cell research. Then in ’88 a NIH panel voted 19 to 2 in favor of federal funding for research. In ’90 Congress voted to veto that overrode the moratorium on federal funding. Which was then vetoed by George Bush then lifted by Clinton, but changed his mind after a public outcry to him about religion. Thus banned in ’95. Again in 2000 it was allowed , but only on pre- existing aborted fetuses and or stem lines. Though the decision to give federal fund ing was difficult, Bush decided to give way to stem cell lines that are already in various stem cell facilities, but leaving all excess embryos (over 100,000) left to be discarded in these facilities. He said that had to take upon this issue with great care. He left the funding for adult stem cell research at 250,000 dollars per year. In Novembers 2004 election California had a Stem Cell research funding ballot that won 60% to 40% and has established the California Institute for Regenerative Health to regulate the cost of research and the research facilities. Before it was as simple as a mother who willingly signs to donate her embryo after independently deciding to abort pregnancy, but now that has been destroyed. Political debate has crippled the thought of having a faster way of acquiring these cells for research, but still continues and gives everyone a chance to prove what human life has to offer even at the brink of death or destruction. Stem cells can be a new light for many and give those dying a chance for survival, but if lives are to be taken away for that, what is the price for our actions and is it worth it? This debate is no where near over and the future of the living and â€Å"living† is at hand and it is not something that any of these side will easily give in to. Some believe it is a personal right to be able to have abortions and donate their offspring to the future of mankind and some stick to their morale ethics because, it is what they believe. There is only one answer and no mid-point between them. Research Papers on The History of Stem Cell ResearchGenetic EngineeringAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaOpen Architechture a white paperBionic Assembly System: A New Concept of SelfResearch Process Part OneInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesCapital PunishmentThree Concepts of PsychodynamicPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyEffects of Television Violence on Children